Skarummer SR1199 Screen Protector Review
Our verdict
At $14.99 the Skarummer SR1199 is the lowest-priced option in this category, and its 4.3-star rating from 262 buyers shows it still manages acceptable performance for basic protection. The tradeoff is a very light 0.1 lb construction and a smaller review sample.
Check price on AmazonBest for
Buyers on an extremely tight budget who want any protection at all for a lower-value TV, particularly for dust and minor surface scratches.
Skip if
You have a TV worth $400 or more and want meaningful impact protection, or you need the confidence of a large review sample before buying.
- Color White
- Weight 0.1 lb
- Priced 63% below the category median ($40.99 across 11 tracked models)
- Weight of 0.1 lb - lighter than 100% of the 11 models we track
Our scorecard
-
Owner rating4.3/5
4.3 average across 262 owner ratings
-
Popularity1.4/5
262 owner reviews, fewer than most models here
The overall score is owner satisfaction weighted by how many reviews back it, so a high rating from few reviews counts for less. The bars below show where this model stands against the other LED, QLED and OLED TVs plus TV mounts, streaming media players, antennas, cables and satellite gear we track in this category on price, popularity and size. Context, not marks against it, and our read of the data, not a lab test.
Overview
The Skarummer SR1199 is the entry-level option in this roundup at $14.99. That price point is hard to beat, and 262 buyers rating it at 4.3 stars indicates it delivers on basic expectations for most purchasers.
At 0.1 lb, this is an extremely thin and lightweight panel. To put that in context, the Ultcover at a similar price range weighs 1.48 lb and the Vizomax weighs 10 lb. At one-tenth of a pound, the SR1199 is functioning more like a semi-rigid film or a very thin overlay than a rigid protective shield. It will handle dust, surface scratches, and very light contact but should not be expected to absorb any real impact.
The white color listed may refer to the product packaging or a border element. The 262-review sample is smaller than most competitors, so the rating has less statistical depth behind it.
Pros
- Lowest price in the category at $14.99
- 4.3-star rating is acceptable for the price tier
- Ultralight at 0.1 lb, very easy to handle
Cons
- At 0.1 lb, construction is extremely thin with minimal impact resistance
- 262 reviews is the second-smallest sample in this roundup
- 4.3 stars is the lowest rating in this category, though still positive
- Limited protection scope, essentially surface-level only
Performance notes
At 0.1 lb, this is one of the lightest TV screen protectors available. This weight indicates a very thin panel or film-style construction. Suitable for basic dust and scratch protection only. No dimensions are listed.
What buyers say
262 reviews at 4.3 stars reflects modest but positive buyer feedback. The sample size is small enough that a few strongly negative reviews could shift the average, so this rating carries less statistical certainty than products with 1,000 or more reviews.
Specifications
| Color | White |
|---|---|
| Weight | 0.1 lb |
Similar LED, QLED and OLED TVs plus TV mounts, streaming media players, antennas, cables and satellite gear to consider
Featured in
Frequently asked questions
Is a 0.1 lb screen protector actually protecting anything?
At 0.1 lb, the SR1199 provides a physical barrier against dust, finger smears, and light surface contact. It is not going to absorb or deflect a meaningful impact the way a 1.5 lb or 10 lb rigid panel might. Think of it as a shield against everyday surface hazards rather than a protective case against knocks or collisions.
Who should buy this versus the $32 to $45 alternatives?
If you are protecting a smaller or lower-value TV and the main concern is keeping the screen clean and scratch-free, the $14.99 price is hard to argue with. If you have kids, pets, or active household members who might make contact with the screen, the extra $18 to $30 for a product with a larger review sample and heavier construction is probably the smarter spend.